AETHERION Worldwide is the fundraising and landing practice of AETHERION Capital.
Does the Netherlands have a tax treaty with your country?
Probably yes. The Ministry of Finance publishes a quarterly overview of every Dutch tax agreement, and every corridor country on this page is covered by one that is in force. Taiwan is the exception in form: what applies there is an arrangement between two representative offices rather than a treaty between states.
A tax treaty, belastingverdrag in Dutch, is an agreement between two countries about which of them may tax what. The Netherlands Tax Administration puts the purpose simply: the agreements exist to prevent you paying tax more than once on the same income or the same assets.
The Ministry of Finance publishes a single overview of every agreement on direct taxes, with the type, the status, the date of signature and the date it entered into force, and updates it every quarter. The figures below come from the version of 1 July 2026. The dates are useful for more than trivia: an agreement only helps from the date it entered into force, and later protocols change parts of it.
The corridor countries, one by one
Every row below is listed in the overview with the status in force. Dates are day, month, year.
| Country | Status | Signed | In force since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Korea | In force | 25-10-1978 | 17-04-1981 |
| Japan | In force | 25-08-2010 | 29-12-2011 |
| Taiwan | In force, see the note below | 27-02-2001 | 16-05-2001 |
| Singapore | In force | 19-02-1971 | 31-08-1971 |
| Turkiye | In force | 27-03-1986 | 30-09-1988 |
| United States | In force | 18-12-1992 | 31-12-1993 |
| India | In force | 30-07-1988 | 21-01-1989 |
Several of these have been amended since. The overview lists a protocol with Korea signed 06-04-1998 and in force since 02-04-1999, a protocol with India signed 10-05-2012 and in force since 02-11-2012, and two protocols with Singapore, the later one signed 25-08-2009 and in force since 01-05-2010. The United States entry carries protocols in force since 30-12-1993 and 28-12-2004. Reading the original text without the protocols gives the wrong answer.
Why Taiwan is a different kind of document
This one is worth getting right, because summaries often flatten it. The Netherlands does not recognise Taiwan as a state, and Taiwan therefore cannot conclude a treaty with the Kingdom. What exists instead is an arrangement concluded in The Hague between the Taipei Representative Office in the Netherlands and the Netherlands Trade and Investment Office in Taipei, to avoid double taxation on income and to exchange tax information.
On the Dutch side it was given effect by a royal decree, published in the Staatsblad, on the prevention of double taxation between the Netherlands and Taiwan. In practice a Taiwanese company deals with rules that look like a treaty and are applied like one. In form, the document is not a treaty between states, and any legal advice about it starts from that fact. What that means for a Taiwanese company landing here is in how a Taiwanese company sets up in the Netherlands.
Sources:
Besluit voorkoming dubbele belasting Nederland en Taiwan (wetten.overheid.nl, in Dutch)
Staatsblad 2001, 213 (officielebekendmakingen.nl, in Dutch)
What an agreement does, and what it does not
An agreement divides up the right to tax. It decides which country may tax a business profit, and it usually caps the percentage the source country may withhold on dividends, interest and royalties. It also contains its own description of a permanent establishment, which can differ from one treaty to the next, so the Dutch domestic description is a starting point and not the final word. That domestic description is in when a foreign company has a permanent establishment.
What an agreement does not do is apply itself. A lower dividend percentage under a treaty has to be claimed, and the Netherlands Tax Administration requires a permit before a company may withhold at the lower treaty percentage. That procedure is described in Dutch dividend withholding tax.
One more layer sits on top for many countries. The multilateral instrument changes or replaces parts of existing treaties where both countries have agreed to it, so two documents can apply at once. And where no agreement exists at all, the Dutch unilateral decree on the prevention of double taxation of 2001 can still give relief.
Source: Belastingdienst, Wanneer een belastingverdrag? (in Dutch)
How to check your own country
The Ministry of Finance page on tax treaties carries the overview document as a download, refreshed every quarter. Look for your country, check the status column reads in force, then note the date in the last column and look for a separate protocol line under the same country name.
Negotiations are a different thing from an agreement. The Ministry publishes which countries it is negotiating with, and a country on that list does not yet have a treaty. If your country is not in the overview, the question of double taxation does not disappear, it just gets answered under domestic rules instead, and that is a conversation to have with a tax adviser in both countries.
Sources
- Ministerie van Financien, Belastingverdragen, met het actuele overzicht van verdragen op het gebied van directe belastingen (in Dutch), checked 22 September 2026
- Rijksoverheid, Belastingverdragen (in Dutch), checked 22 September 2026
- Belastingdienst, Wanneer een belastingverdrag? (in Dutch), checked 22 September 2026
- Besluit voorkoming dubbele belasting Nederland en Taiwan (wetten.overheid.nl, in Dutch), checked 22 September 2026
Checked on 22 September 2026. This page is general information, not legal, tax or investment advice. Rules change: check the official source, or ask an adviser, before you act on it.
Is a European round realistic for you?
Ten lines about your company is enough for us to tell you what the route looks like.
Want the whole picture first? See the Route